Articles: 56    Showing: 23 to 33 Previous page - Next page page: 1 2 3 4 5 6  

Referrer spam

Published by manu
Tags:

You may have noticed in your web server logs that there are a few visitors that seem to come from crappy websites, this is sometimes called referrer spam. This is profitable for a couple of reasons:

  • Some people publish their statistics
    dodgy webmasters are happy as they get more links to their sites. Some have added "no rel" or things like that, but still, if the logs are published so are the domain names/urls.

  • Google analytics
    Half of the Internet has voluntarily installed a Trojan Horse on their websites, it's called "Google Analytics" and it basically sends all your visitors footprints to Google exceptions apply [1]. I cannot say how Google measures it up, but I am going to guess that this might still be profitable to our dodgy webmasters web site ranking.

Some have started a blacklist of domain names or even IPs that produce referrer spam, I think any blacklist, especially like this one is really bad. For one, if a domain name blacklist became popular then the dodgy spammer could/would start referring competitor's websites. Public blacklists are bad. Always. If they are used then they can quickly get out of control (that's all another story).

For me a simple idea is to maintain my own private list of dodgy domains that I notice in my logs and reject visitors that are referred by them. I'm sure it's not the most efficient thing ever, but who cares, it's mostly to clear the statistics a bit and have a laugh with those that fake referrers manually.

This is a sample of the code I have written, as you can see it is extremely simple:

// List spam referrer domains $bad_referrers = array ( 'dodgywebsite.tld', 'someotherbadwebsitethatlikeslongdomainnames.tld', ); // check if the referrer is "bad" foreach ($bad_referrers as $v) { if (preg_match("#^https?://(w{3}.)?$v#", $_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER])) { // if so, redirect the visitor to their fake referrer.. LOL header("Location: http://$v"); } }

That should redirect bad referrers to the site they are referring to. The regular expression takes care of an eventual "www." and http|s so you do not need to list the protocol or the standard www subdomain.

[1] Google analytics wont work on those who don't execute javascript or have a special hosts file that includes: 0.0.0.0 google-analytics.com www.google-analytics.com ssl.google-analytics.com

comments 1

A message to Anonymous

Published by manu
Tags:

Hello Anonymous. Some people have criticised your actions, called you a "kiddie script" and/or claimed you have hurt "the cause". I tend to disagree because:

  • You made noise and raised awareness
  • Nobody was hurt and no credit card numbers stolen
  • You have been trying other things as well, faxes, phones, videos, paper etc. this shows your goal is not to simply take down web sites
  • When things are so openly absurd reactions cannot be avoided
  • Oh and:
  • "They" started it..

Some say you guys are a bunch of kids, if it is true it only adds to your credit.

DDOS does seem to be illegal in many places, but it is definitely not the worst thing that has happened to our world. For me (and many others) these actions were closer to protest then to attacks.

Disclaimer: I am not inciting anyone to do anything illegal, etc etc...
comments

Wikileaks - follow up

Published by manu
Updated
Tags:

The past week or so has been quite interesting and seems this pending issue will not simply "go away", at least not that easily. I have gathered a few interesting links about what's up and down, I will try to update this.. (there are so many pages about this it's out of control).

Wikileaks

Internet Protests

Anon sites/channels (many down)

A few Anonymous channels have been taken down, there are plenty of others coming up, going down, moving around etc..

  • AnonOps communication - active
  • twitter.com/Anonops - active
  • facebook.com/anonops - active (if you happen to use facebook....)
  • anonops.net - Seems like Enom has removed the name server for the domain on Dec 8 2010: Domain Name: ANONOPS.NET Registrar: ENOM, INC. Whois Server: whois.enom.com Referral URL: http://www.enom.com Name Server: No nameserver Status: ok Updated Date: 08-dec-2010 Creation Date: 26-oct-2010 Expiration Date: 26-oct-2011
  • anonops.info - domain has been de-activated today (Dec 14 2010): Domain ID:D35610231-LRMS Domain Name:ANONOPS.INFO Created On:29-Nov-2010 18:03:09 UTC Last Updated On:14-Dec-2010 01:08:48 UTC Expiration Date:29-Nov-2011 18:03:09 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R126-LRMS) Status:INACTIVE Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
  • twitter.com/Anon_Operation - suspended
  • twitter.com/Anon_Operationn - suspended

Some people have been deleting their Paypal accounts and leaving a comments about how they feel.

comments 1

URL shorteners == privacy shortener

Published by manu
Tags:

Today I would like to talk/rant about URL shorteners, these things that take a good old link and turn it into something short and obscure.

One day people realised that sending long links over some mediums such as email or instant messaging could be a pain as the link would sometimes be cut up into pieces, and lose clickability. One of the reasons (IMHO) was that in those days fancy clean URLs were not so common so it would be easy to come across some of those crazy long links.

Then came the tweeting days, when the Internet decided it was time that everybody published content, and because most people have difficulties with literary expectations that exceed one sentence they came up with the brilliant 140 character limit (also to be compatible with SMS). In this situation even a normal optimised pretty link looked super fat, it's like putting a normal healthy human being next to Kate Moss..

This was already becoming a problem but then people took it to the next level, links nowadays get shortened even when posted on websites.. It makes absolutely no sense.. .

So what is wrong anyway ?

  • It hides the destination of the link
  • It adds a layer of failability, now you depend on the url shortening service, if they go down or moderate/filter your link.. .
  • There is a major leak of privacy
    • The clicker generates statistics at the URL shortener's service
    • The statistics are linked with the person who generated the URL and all the others that have followed the link

These statistics are available to whoever creates the link (you need to create an account generally for this function), there could be more things done with them. I am sure it can be quite interesting to see how a link gets propagated especially if you include IPs, User-Agents and most interesting maybe: the referrer (the site where the link was posted). I am sure with this kind of information you could map a viral movement of clicks a la Hans Rosling.. But as we all know, the Internet is power tool for marketing and the knowledge gained from these services will not benefit science nor the general public, au contraire.

So why ? Why do people use such things ? Even on those Twitter/Identi.ca type things I found that most links can actually fit and with room for a short description. I've even seen some privacy rights organisations who cannot restrain themselves from the urge to use such links, in emails and on their websites. Hello, it's like a vegetarian protesting in leather boots !

I am surprised to be writing this in 2010, I thought this obsession with having the shortest URL would have passed a few years ago.. . What next, maybe The Pirate Bay will start using Bit.ly as well ?

comments 1

Reporting Spam to hotmail

Published by manu
Updated
Tags:

I have been receiving some spam from authenticated hotmail users lately, so I thought it could be useful to report it to them. Remembering some of the Microsoft logic I decided to use the Bing search engine to find out what kind of process they may have set up for the common people to use. Of course I did this because they do not respond to the recommended "abuse@domain.tld" addresses, they are above that sort of thing anyway.

I finally found this very informative page on how to report spam to hotmail and I think "what if I click the link titled How to report abusive e-mail with full headers to MSN?". So I do just that, and guess what, it's a link to a a page titled Dealing with Pornography Online, and the page does not even contain any information on how to deal with porn online... . It's the same for the link to the page that is supposed to explain how to identify if the mail has been sent using their systems. It's hopeless.

Update

It seems I spoke to soon, they have taken note of my email, however their auto replies have been blocked because the ACK emails are sent from misconfigured SMTP servers:

NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bay0-xmr-009.hotmail.com[65.54.241.58]: 450 4.7.1 <BAY0-XMR-009.phx.gbl>: Helo command rejected: Host not found; from=<abuse@msn.com> to=<ME> proto=ESMTP helo=<BAY0-XMR-009.phx.gbl>

I of course set up some stuff to at least be able to see where this goes.. .. I will update this article when they send the actual response.

comments

Stop government snooping on email and Facebook

Published by manu
Tags:

If you are in the petition signing mood today OR you just do not feel very comfortable with the idea with the government reading every email (the ones they actually can read of course) as well as all facebook transmissions (for those still using it) and other online communications (where possible).. . OR if you just feel like the money could be better spent on other matters.. then sign the Open Rights Groups petition.

comments

Source Code Download Links are Dying

Published by manu

Something is very wrong on the Internet, very. When people work on a server many tend to use a workstation, open a terminal and connect to the server and then open a browser to look for various information and eventually a file/package to download. What we would normally should do is find the link to the file we need, then go to the terminal where we are connected to our server and use something like wget to get the file downloaded where we actually need it to be... .. Well my friend, little by little those links are disappearing, you now need to have JavaScript activated to download source code from some of the biggest "open source code sharing lol" sites..

What can we do ? Create a mirror site whose sole purpose would be to contain wgettable links ? Or petition until they put normal transferable download URLs so we can get some work done and not have to transfer files one time to many. And yes, it is not even eco friendly as these bits of code need to be transferred at least twice before getting where they need to be.

What do you think ?

comments 6

OpenOffice, not impressed

Published by manu

I just have to say one thing: OpenOffice as much as any other "office" program is just the worst thing that has ever happened to computers. I have never wasted so much time with any program, even Windows is more entertaining.. Today I tried to do 2 things with OpenOffice Impress (the thing to do slide show presentations, mostly using a computer screen (or projector) to display the finished work).

  1. Set the background to a color not in the drop down list
  2. Use pixels as a unit of measure
OpenOffice not Impressed No matter what the physical size of your screen and/or the resolution it is 28cm wide and 21cm high !

It seems again that I am wrong to even want to do those things as apparently the majority of humans think in centimeters even when doing work that that will stay on a screen. Alone ? Maybe not, a few others also have the same issue. As for the colors, I don't know maybe I'm the only one with a screen that supports more than 256 colors ?

So I guess I'll have to do things the wrong way, again.

What I have learned today: If no shoe fits, walk barefoot.

comments

Stealing the Internet

Published by manu
Tags:

So Google and Verizon want to be business buddies, I do not understand how anyone can think this is good.. . detailed official crap here.

In short this all about saying that net neutrality isn't necessary on wireless (mobile) networks. This is very smart on their behalf because so many humans believe that Google will do no evil however as we may already know, the future Internet may have most of it's traffic come from mobile networks. Preparing the terrain while claiming that mobile networking is still beta might actually get them to finish killing off the Internet we love. Oh, and all this while confusing the non-Internet-savy by stating how much neutrality and accessibility to The Network is important (as long as it's by wire (*DSL/Fiber/cable/RTC).. .

comments

WTUnderground

Published by manu
Tags:

I have found a public transportation system worse than the Parisian RATP. In total there are more lines affected than non affected.. : ]. It's totally out of control this Underground.

These are photos of the Transport for London website..

So, what's left of the underground ? The colored lines are those that are closed

(to get from here to there I might just book a flight.. .... euh, that is if the travel agency doesn't go bankrupt and BAA doesn't go on strike* at the same time (as another volcano ash rainfall ?). ... .. gosh it's not easy getting around in this country.)

* just to be clear, I am NOT against the BAA strike. :]
comments 2

why filesharing has NOT killed 'unlimited' mobile data contracts

Published by manu
Tags:

I just read a sad piece of technical journalism from Charles Arthur for the Guardian. I'll resume his rant; he blames p2p (file-sharing) usage for the new "no more unlimited mobile networking" policy that apparently O2 is moving into. He cites an O2 blog post which actually makes no mention of this.

According to the very imprecise graphic 97% of the users consume less than 500MB a month, the average would be 200 and 0.1% use more than 690MB. In short, very very few people tend to exaggerate IP (data) usage. If that caused any real nuisance to the network that would mean that either the operator's network is insufficient and/or they do not have the knowledge to implement simple QoS regulations (example: slow down the speed when network usage goes up so that all traffic can be on the move). So what is the real deal here ? Why are operators no longer happy to offer unlimited data for a fixed price ?

My conspiration theory is as follows: Now that you can access the Internet via your mobile device you can trade limited "text messages" (SMS) for unlimited text via realtime chat (irc/msn/aim/icq/etc) or email, you can trade phone calls for VOIP (skype, etc). And all this being on The Network (Internet) means that there is no difference between local and long distance communications. This is precisely, in my opinion, the real part where the operators may feel cheated. Users can escape the overcharges of calls and text messages not included in their plans, and why not even get a minimal call/text deal and just go for the unlimited mobile internet.

In reality the very few who actually do use p2p networks (illegal or legal btw) are not a real nuisance for the network, they are instead, AS USUAL, an excuse to change policies, pricing and laws. In this case, it's actually a "technology journalist" ranting about this, as if 0.1% of the data/phone users stole directly from his pocket.

Oh, and one more thing, I'm pretty sure those statistics include users who bought the mobile Internet dongle thing, you know the 3G usb device intended to connect computers to the Internet, in that case it's more than normal to go over 690MB in one month..

comments

Articles: 56    Showing: 23 to 33 Previous page - Next page page: 1 2 3 4 5 6