Google+ or Google minus

Last night I received a "google+ link", something about a conversation etc etc.. I was assuming that even though I don't have a google account I could probably read and maybe even participate in the conversation. Not. I was obnoxiously invited to create a gaccount.

This morning I followed a friend's link to an article on google+, it says that google+ will force facebook to be more open to other platforms. Of course the previous experience showed me that I will absolutely need a gaccount before touching anything.

First reaction to the article is, IF and really IF google does anything to "open" other online social networks then we must note that they are very far from being the first to help. Just the fact that it is not by default designed from ground up on that basis is already a problem. Actually, I don't see any mention of their platform even remotely wanting to be capable of interacting with other servers (Alert: could be wrong).

For me the projects that will have had anything to do with opening anything up are:


These projects are for me the true innovators and social network can openers They come by default with the idea of independent nodes that interconnect and truly create the real social network.

comments:
avatar

Nux - http://www.nux.ro

The sad true is that those "open" projects are stillborn. Their audience is only a handful of geeks (except for identica, this "freenode" of the tweets world).
So, as someone used to say last week, we had some freedom (blogs+trackbacks+ping+other crap), we still have it but it's dying. We should have never moved from that, but tell that to the sheep. Let's welcome our new messiahs: facebook, google, tumblr, tweeter etc.
Leave a comment
You may use the following HTML tags: <p> <a> <strong> <b> <em> <i> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <pre>

Your comments WILL NOT be submitted to any third party (not even for anti spam verification).